Google
RSS Feeds RSS | Views on ITInews | contact | terms of use | privacy 
 


Editorial Categories:

FINANCIAL SERVICES
ADVISERS & BROKERS
BANKING & BONDS
BUSINESS MANAGEMENT
COLUMNISTS
CONSUMER AFFAIRS
CRIME & FRAUD
ECONOMY & GLOBAL
EDUCATION & TRAINING
ESTATES & WILLS
HEALTHCARE INSURANCE
INDUSTRY & LEGISLATION
INSURANCE
INVESTING
LEGAL AFFAIRS
LIABILITY INSURANCE
LIFE INSURANCE
MARKETING
PEOPLE & COMPANIES
POLITICS
PROPERTY
RETIREMENT PROVISION
REVIEWS
ROAD ACCIDENT FUND
SHARES & UNIT TRUSTS
SHORT-TERM INSURANCE
TAXATION
TECHNOLOGY
VIEWS & LETTERS


Forthcoming Events:

No Upcoming Events


Available Recruitment:

No Vacancies Listed...


Save by getting insurance quotes


Your Editor, Brent WilsonInforming Consumers and Financial Advisors since 1988 | Click Here to Advertise
Seriously growing your money
Press Offices > Asset Managers

Foord Asset Management
Press Office Feature : Investment management and performance fees

Company: Foord Asset Management
Author:Nick Curtin
Email:[email protected]
Posted:21 Jan 2016

 Email this article Comment on this Article  Print this article

What constitutes “good value for money”?

Investment management fees in general and performance fee structures in particular have attracted a lot of attention in recent times.

This is unsurprising given National Treasury’s myriad reform proposals across the savings industry and a lower return market environment.

The debate should be welcomed by all who have an interest in ensuring good value for money in South Africa’s long-term savings industry. It is first important to clarify what “good value for money” actually means.  

The concept of cost versus value is important to the definition of good value for money – “cheap” does not necessarily equate to “good value”.

When drawing conclusions therefore, the focus should always be on return outcomes after costs (for both active and passive alternatives).

If cost is 1% but the investor receives a 15% return, the after cost value for money is better than if the cost is 0.50% and the return is 10% (all else being equal).  

In short, it is possible to pay a premium price and receive a premium outcome. Likewise it is possible that paying peanuts begets mediocrity.

As the saying goes, cost is what you pay, value is what you get and cost should only become the major issue when value is in question. The assessment of “value for money” must be calibrated as such.  

Importantly, fixed fees do not necessarily equate to lower fees.

Compared to performance fee structures, fixed fee methodologies simply move a large chunk of the fee from a variable charging structure that is contingent on actual delivery of outperformance to a fixed structure that is charged regardless of actual delivered outcomes.

This could equally result in higher cost outcomes on average as it could result in lower; there are many variables at play. To assume one outcome over the other would be disingenuous.  

Accordingly, many active managers are typically agnostic between performance fee and fixed fee charging methodologies.

Generally, as a private sector business, an investment manager’s investment capacity pricing is achieved through careful analysis of: value proposition; competitive advantages; market competition; business growth strategy amongst other metrics.

As with any private enterprise subject to market forces, these entities will survive and thrive, or not, depending on how they deliver on their value proposition to their customers.  

Lastly, it is important to dispel the myth that a performance fee is a fixed fee with an additional sharing rate component.

In fact, it works in the opposite direction – it is the fixed price for the service disaggregated into a fixed component and a component that is contingent on performance.

If investment manager X has determined that the price for the firm’s investment capacity is Y, then investors can either pay Y (fixed) or they can pay (Y-Z) fixed and only pay (Z) on actual delivery of the anticipated outperformance.  

Performance fees introduce optionality into the cost structure that is only actually paid by investors if the actual delivered outcome (i.e. value received) is in excess of the passive alternative (or another agreed benchmark).

This pricing optionality is clearly in the members’ best interests and only in the managers’ best interests if they actually deliver their expectation.

In our view, if correctly and ethically implemented, performance fees epitomize the alignment of interests between managers and investors.
      

Comments:
There are no comments at this stage. Be the first to comment!
Please Login To Comment On an Article - Click here To Login

ITInews invites comments at the foot of each of its articles in which readers can respond freely - anonymously if they wish - to various topical issues and industry debates. However, comments submitted by readers that are defamatory or deemed, by the editors, to be racist or obscene will be deleted from the database. Furthermore, ITInews's editor would like to caution potential posters on its websites that while it welcomes robust debate, it will not hesitate to make the IP addresses of the authors of such defamatory statements available to the authorities, in the event of a court order compelling them to do so.



Get car, home, life and business insurance quotes in 3 easy steps


Foord Asset Management


Join us today

More from Foord Asset Management
The role of cash in your investment portfolio
Market recoveries often deliver the best investment returns
Stewardship – Substance Over Form
Professional fund managers should possess an ethic that informs every investment decision
Don't chop and change your investments
Make a well-considered decision at the inception of the investment and persist with that decision
Crystal ball investing – Speculation leads to investment loss
A successful long-term investment philosophy eschews trends
Why we don’t save enough
Consider making saving for retirement a default option rather than an active choice.
Are fees incentive enough?
The value and importance of co-investment
Why we blow our Christmas bonuses (and why we need to save ourselves from ourselves)
Investment is all about building a platform for later consumption
What determines the short-term direction of equity markets?
Until very recently, global equity markets have been on a steady upward trajectory
Improving global economies no panacea for South Africa
Foreign equities remain our preferred asset class
A three decade track record that speaks for itself
Outstanding long-term investment performance


Archived Articles featuring this company ...


Insurance Quotes


Car Insurance Quotes
Household Insurance Quotes
Business Insurance Quotes
Funeral Insurance Quotes
Life Insurance Quotes

Read the InsuranceQuotes Blog
ITM Website Design Cape Town
Copyright © 2005 - 2015 ITInews Online Publications (Pty) Ltd. All rights reserved Insurance Times & Investments Online and ITInews. ..::ISSN 1995-1256::.. No part of the materials including graphics or logos, available in this Web site may be copied, photocopied, reproduced, translated or reduced to any electronic medium or machine-readable form, in whole or in part, without specific permission from ITInews Online Publications (Pty) Ltd. Distribution for commercial purposes is prohibited.