RSS Feeds RSS | Views on ITInews | contact | terms of use | privacy 

Editorial Categories:


Forthcoming Events:

No Upcoming Events

Save by getting insurance quotes

Proudly South AfricanInforming Consumers and Financial Advisors since 1988 | Click Here to Advertise
Car, household, life and business insurance quotes

News Article : How perfect is that perfect job?
Category: Business Management : Organisational culture
Author:Prof Anton Grobler
Email:[email protected]
Posted:15 Jun 2015

 Email this article Comment on this Article  Print this article

Considering the psychology behind job satisfaction

What is important to the company at which we work sends a signal to society about who we are, and has implications for our own self-definition, regardless of the job level.

Suppose that you work at a company that has recently received some negative attention in the media.  You’re on a solid career path and each day brings with it satisfaction in your achievements. 

Imagine that you are at a cocktail party and someone asks you where you work. Despite having a good job and positive career prospects, you find yourself hesitating before mentioning the name of the company. 

Now let’s suppose that you work for a company that has just been voted as one of the most innovative companies to work for.  Your job is fine, although, if you’re honest, at times frustrating. 

And yet the same question posed at the same cocktail party might evoke a very different response in you.   

According to one of the theories of industrial and organisational psychology, the company that we work for represents a concrete, public expression of our values, and can be more important than the job itself.

What is important to the company at which we work sends a signal to society about who we are, and has implications for our own self-definition, regardless of the job level.

Termed ‘value congruence’, this can be more important than the job itself.  

The way we look for jobs and seek job satisfaction is a complex psychological and behavioural process upon which we embark from the moment we read the job specification.  This journey continues throughout our duration of employment at the company. 

This complex process can be distilled into three probable behaviours:  conform; confront; capitulate.  These behaviours provide insights into what we do when we look for our perfect job and how we appraise it - often without consciously acknowledging that we’re doing it. 

Good job fit boils down to a ‘sameness’ or similarity that we recognise in the organisation and ourselves.  As individuals, we use our personal values as criteria to select and justify actions and to evaluate people and events. 

‘Person-organisation fit’ (P-O fit) ascertains how congruent our values are to the norms and values of the organisation.   This P-O fit is dynamic and can change over time.  It can become better or worse, as the company or individual changes. 

Furthermore, as they go along, both the individual and the organisation seeks to attain higher levels of fit.  For the individual this might mean conforming, confronting or capitulating in various ways which can mean leaving the organisation to seek a higher level of fit somewhere else.

There are two ways to conform. One way is healthy, and signifies the typical adjustment to workplace realities that is required of any working individual.  

The other is known as dysfunctional conforming and occurs when the individual behaves in a way that is not appropriate to their own values, but is behaviour that is practised and reinforced by the organisation, a relatively new construct within the business ethics domain. 

Known as prosocial rule-breaking, it describes an act that is motivated less by deviant intention and more by a desire to assist the organisation in meeting its objectives. 

We would say that prosocial rule-breaking is the knowing violation of a formal organisational policy, regulation, or prohibition in order to promote the welfare of the organisation or one of its stakeholders.

Prosocial rule-breaking brings to mind the crash of financial markets in 2008, which unearthed widespread rule-breaking among financial institutions in the United States.

Confronting is the second probable behaviour outcome.  This will occur when the individual becomes aware of a dissonance between the values of the organisation and themselves.

The individual will feel their own internal pressure to take steps to set the balance right. 

They might attempt to change things in the organisation - at the extreme level consider the whistle-blower who takes things beyond the internal organisational structure in the attempt to effect change  - or they could decide to leave the organisational environment altogether.

While leaving the organisation might seem like the easier route, it can have momentous consequences for the individual, both practically (how easy it is to leave; what are the alternatives?) and psychologically (a shock to the system which prompts reassessment of values).

The final behaviour is one of capitulation.  Staying in an organisation where poor P-O fit manifests has negative effects. 

The individual might withdraw from their job.  On a physical level this would include absenteeism, and on the psychological level this could present as lowered levels of job commitment. 

Research has shown that capitulating has the potential to negatively impact on the emotional psychological states and well-being of the individual.

P-O fit is a powerful aspect not only when choosing a job, but staying in it. 

Companies have a responsibility to ensure that the P-O fit remains positive for employees and encourages behaviour in sync with their values. 

Programmes such as the Unisa Graduate School of Business Leadership (SBL) Master of Business Leadership (MBL) propel leaders to adopt innovative business approaches that can support enhanced selection systems and ensure alternatives are created for their employees beyond confrontation and capitulation.

Prof Anton Grobler is Area Head of Organisational Behaviour and Leadership at Unisa’s Graduate School of Business Leadership (SBL) 

There are no comments at this stage. Be the first to comment!
Please Login To Comment On an Article - Click here To Login

ITInews invites comments at the foot of each of its articles in which readers can respond freely - anonymously if they wish - to various topical issues and industry debates. However, comments submitted by readers that are defamatory or deemed, by the editors, to be racist or obscene will be deleted from the database. Furthermore, ITInews's editor would like to caution potential posters on its websites that while it welcomes robust debate, it will not hesitate to make the IP addresses of the authors of such defamatory statements available to the authorities, in the event of a court order compelling them to do so.

Get car, home, life and business insurance quotes in 3 easy steps

Join us today

Insurance Quotes

Car Insurance Quotes
Household Insurance Quotes
Business Insurance Quotes
Funeral Insurance Quotes
Life Insurance Quotes

Read the InsuranceQuotes Blog

Business Management - Organisational culture
Best Practices
Organisational culture
Practice Building
Software Reviews

More in Business Management : Organisational culture
Changing strategies for success
It is critical for innovation to become a key attribute of day-to-day business
African CEOs optimistic about growth despite challenges on the continent
PwC report on opportunities and risks to doing business in Africa
Insurance 2020: Unleashing the value from values
Communications and training alone won’t drive change

Available Recruitment:
No Vacancies Listed...

ITM Website Design Cape Town
Copyright © 2005 - 2015 ITInews Online Publications (Pty) Ltd. All rights reserved Insurance Times & Investments Online and ITInews. ..::ISSN 1995-1256::.. No part of the materials including graphics or logos, available in this Web site may be copied, photocopied, reproduced, translated or reduced to any electronic medium or machine-readable form, in whole or in part, without specific permission from ITInews Online Publications (Pty) Ltd. Distribution for commercial purposes is prohibited.