RSS Feeds RSS | Views on ITInews | contact | terms of use | privacy 

Editorial Categories:


Forthcoming Events:

No Upcoming Events

Save by getting insurance quotes

Proudly South AfricanInforming Consumers and Financial Advisors since 1988 | Click Here to Advertise
Car, household, life and business insurance quotes

News Article : Regulator deregisters GetMed Medical Scheme
Category: Healthcare Insurance : Medical Schemes
Author:Edited by ITInews
Email:[email protected]
Posted:27 Sep 2011

 Email this article Comment on this Article  Print this article

Complaints received from its members

The Office of the Registrar for Medical Schemes has taken the decision to cancel the registration of GetMed Medical Scheme in terms of section 27 of the Medical Schemes Act, 131 of 1998.

During 2009 the Office of the Registrar for Medical Schemes became aware of GetMed Health Protection Plan, an unregistered product operating within the medical schemes industry, through various complaints received from its members.

GetMed Health Protection Plan started off as a range of benefit options for the sick fund of the Bargaining Council for the Building Industry, Kimberley.

GetMed (Pty) Ltd is a company that administers these benefit options on behalf of the Bargaining Council.

However, GetMed (Pty) Ltd expanded the GetMed Health Protection Plan product outside the bargaining council environment by marketing the product as a medical scheme.

They marketed their product all over the country at an attractive price to members of the public and more specifically to corporate entities for their employees.

The Registrar for Medical Schemes determined that this product clearly fell within the definition of “doing the business of a medical scheme” as defined by the Medical Schemes Act, 131 of 1998.

During this Office’s engagement with GetMed (Pty) Ltd it was established that more than 2 500 members had enrolled onto the GetMed Health Protection Plan product.

The directors of GetMed (Pty) Ltd acknowledged the fact that their product fell within the confinements of the Medical Schemes Act and indicated their eagerness to register as a medical scheme.

The Office of the Registrar conditionally registered GetMed Medical Scheme on 17 December 2010 as a medical scheme in order to afford protection to the large quantity of members already on the books of GetMed Health Protection Plan.

The following conditions were imposed:

(i) To provide a financial guarantee as required by the Medical Schemes Act for all medical schemes;
(ii) To pay the application fees for the accreditation of the administration and managed care organisations;
(iii) To provide further documentation to the Accreditation Unit of the Office of the Registrar for Medical Schemes based on the initial evaluations done on their administration and managed care organisations; and
(iv) To provide a reinsurance contract for evaluation by the Office of the Registrar.

Despite various correspondence and meetings in this regard, GetMed Medical Scheme failed to comply with the conditions set out above.

After numerous attempts by this Office to get GetMed Medical Scheme to comply with the conditions and after receiving a spike in complaints relating to payment of claims by members of GetMed Medical Scheme, the Registrar concluded that GetMed Medical Scheme would not be able to fulfill the conditions of its registration.

In the interest of the members of GetMed Medical Scheme specifically and the medical scheme industry in general, the Registrar wrote a letter to GetMed Medical Scheme on 17 August 2011 cancelling its registration as a medical scheme in terms of Section 27 of the Medical Schemes Act.

The Registrar ordered the scheme to immediately cease and desist from operating its business as a medical scheme. GetMed Medical Scheme was asked to confirm it’s adherence to this order but failed to respond to this request.

GetMed Medical Scheme is no longer a registered medical scheme and the Council for Medical Schemes (CMS) cannot offer the members of the scheme the same protection as members of other medical schemes registered and regulated by the CMS.

In fact, based on the numerous complaints recently received by this Office, the Registrar is concerned whether GetMed Medical Scheme will be able to honour the claims of their members.

Members and corporate clients of GetMed Medical Scheme are advised to urgently seek advice on their medical cover as the Office of the Registrar of Medical Schemes will not be able to resolve their complaints.

The Registrar regrets that even after the leniency afforded to GetMed Medical Scheme to assure its compliance to the Medical Schemes Act, the scheme has failed to do so.

There are no comments at this stage. Be the first to comment!
Please Login To Comment On an Article - Click here To Login

ITInews invites comments at the foot of each of its articles in which readers can respond freely - anonymously if they wish - to various topical issues and industry debates. However, comments submitted by readers that are defamatory or deemed, by the editors, to be racist or obscene will be deleted from the database. Furthermore, ITInews's editor would like to caution potential posters on its websites that while it welcomes robust debate, it will not hesitate to make the IP addresses of the authors of such defamatory statements available to the authorities, in the event of a court order compelling them to do so.

Get car, home, life and business insurance quotes in 3 easy steps

Join us today

Insurance Quotes

Car Insurance Quotes
Household Insurance Quotes
Business Insurance Quotes
Funeral Insurance Quotes
Life Insurance Quotes

Read the InsuranceQuotes Blog

Healthcare Insurance - Medical Schemes
Medical Schemes
State Healthcare

More in Healthcare Insurance : Medical Schemes
The healthy decline of South African Medical Aid Schemes
Raising contributions while reducing benefits is not sustainable
Regulation 8 – Do we really think this is our only problem?
A rights based medical scheme framework with voluntary membership requirements
Discovery Health response to Stan Eiser
It is unclear why Mr. Eiser chooses to persist with these unfounded allegations
Discovery’s probable loss of control over Discovery Health Medical Scheme
By now Gore should have reduced Limited’s cash dependency on DHMS
Medical aids "need to demystify themselves"
Medical aids are offering less value for money
Regulator of medical schemes concerned over false advertising, high administration fees
"The public is being misled"
High Court dismissal of BHF application has profound implications for medical schemes industry
Triumph of a fanciful ideology on healthcare financing that lacks sustainability
I found your article on the court ruling regarding PMBs to be misleading
The uncertainty with regards to pricing of healthcare will be allowed to continue
Victory for regulator, members of medical schemes
The prescribed minimum benefits (PMBs) which protect members of medical schemes remain in place
There are 2 realities about private medical cover in SA
Firstly it is expensive and secondly, benefit structures are complex
The latest on Bonitas Medical Fund
Postponement of the special general meeting and elections to 28 May 2011
Regulator wants curator for Sizwe Medical Fund
Investigation points to material irregularities
Bonitas in new hands
Costs awarded on a punitive basis
Regulator wants curator for Bonitas Medical Fund
... the third-largest medical scheme
Resolution no longer an administrator and managed care organisation
Flagrant contravention of the provisions contained in Regulation 23 of the Medical Schemes Act
How to choose your medical aid
I’m often asked by patients to
SAG Response to SAMA
Reduce the power of administrators
Specialist Advocacy Group overview
Particularly concerned for the safety of the patient in the current environment
Nonsense, says Discovery Health, we’ve never been better - response to newsletter
DHMS continues to enjoy the highest rating of any medical scheme in South Africa
Public or private practice?
Healthcare is a monopolistic business

Join ITInews in supporting

Available Recruitment:
No Vacancies Listed...

ITM Website Design Cape Town
Copyright © 2005 - 2015 ITInews Online Publications (Pty) Ltd. All rights reserved Insurance Times & Investments Online and ITInews. ..::ISSN 1995-1256::.. No part of the materials including graphics or logos, available in this Web site may be copied, photocopied, reproduced, translated or reduced to any electronic medium or machine-readable form, in whole or in part, without specific permission from ITInews Online Publications (Pty) Ltd. Distribution for commercial purposes is prohibited.