RSS Feeds RSS | Views on ITInews | contact | terms of use | privacy 

Editorial Categories:


Forthcoming Events:

No Upcoming Events

Save by getting insurance quotes

Proudly South AfricanInforming Consumers and Financial Advisors since 1988 | Click Here to Advertise
Car, household, life and business insurance quotes

News Article : The healthy decline of South African Medical Aid Schemes
Category: Healthcare Insurance : Medical Schemes
Author:Michael Settas
Email:[email protected]
Posted:03 Nov 2015

 Email this article Comment on this Article  Print this article

Raising contributions while reducing benefits is not sustainable

CMS statement that medical aids are in good health is overly simplistic assessment of sustainability. Opinion by: Michael Settas, Managing Director, Xelus Specialised Risk Solutions.

The recent claim by the medical schemes industry regulator, the Council for Medical Schemes, that the industry is in a sustainable position is in stark contrast to the pervasive problems currently facing the private healthcare sector.

The claim by the CMS that because “solvency levels are high, the industry is sustainable” is an incredibly simplistic assessment of sustainability.

There is an urgent need for astute regulatory reform that will create efficiencies in both the delivery and financing of private healthcare in SA.

Medical schemes are forced every year to raise contributions well above CPI and, simultaneously, reduce cover levels.

Most medical providers also increase their fees above CPI which then means that the out-of-pocket spend increases at rates of 3 or even 4 times CPI, forcing medical scheme members to purchase supplementary health insurance products to fill the gaps created in their medical scheme cover.

How can such a situation be considered sustainable?

Using the solvency matter as one example to demonstrate the plethora of inefficiencies that add to the sustainability problems facing medical schemes consider the following - the current regulatory solvency requirement for medical schemes is simply a flat rate of 25% of their annual contribution income.

Where, how or why that formula was derived is anyone’s guess. It has no scientific or financial basis yet it has not been reviewed in decades.

Further to that, the statutory investment restrictions on these funds are rigid and inflexible.

Collectively, medical schemes presently hold R50 billion in reserves and most of these funds must be invested in cash or cash equivalents according to regulations.

This is both an inappropriate and inefficient manner of investing such substantial funds.

A risk based capital model would be far more efficient, as reserves would only be applied against measurable risks and investment criteria could then be set in accordance with the level of risk posed.

These reserves could also be used by medical schemes to purchase institutional providers of healthcare services, such as hospitals and day clinics, which would partly offset the high levels of medical inflation that medical schemes face each year.

This would also inject much needed competition into the current supply chains of medical providers, many of which are monopolised and contain intrinsic conflicts of interest that are not in the best interest of patients.

A perfect example of such conflicts is hospital ownership by doctors. They can either be directly owned or via the purchase of public shares of listed hospital groups but there is no doubt that they create a moral hazard.

Many countries have outlawed direct and indirect ownership of healthcare institutions by individual practitioners to avoid such conflicts.

Consider that the average share price growth of hospital groups Netcare and Mediclinic has been 28% and 30% per annum respectively for the past 14 years.

That is astonishing, sustained growth - but the repercussion for members of medical schemes is that, in real terms, private hospital fees have more than doubled since 2000.

Couple these issues with extensive membership rights that are given to consumers via the same medical scheme regulatory framework, such as guaranteed acceptance at any age (open enrolment) and the prescribed minimum benefits, medical schemes are stuck within an exceedingly inefficient and outdated healthcare system.

These are only some of many problems in the private healthcare sector and they reflect precisely why the current regulatory framework is anything but sustainable and that there is a dire need for government to urgently reform it if medical schemes are to survive.

Removing medical scheme regulation from the Department of Health and placing it under the Twin Peaks framework would be a good start.

From there, the market conduct of, not only medical schemes, but also the providers of healthcare could be better regulated and monitored for efficiencies and conflicts of interest.

Hopefully the enquiry of the private healthcare sector that is currently underway by the Competition Commission will identify these problems and put forward similar recommendations.

To continue in the current regulatory framework is simply a market failure in waiting.

There are no comments at this stage. Be the first to comment!
Please Login To Comment On an Article - Click here To Login

ITInews invites comments at the foot of each of its articles in which readers can respond freely - anonymously if they wish - to various topical issues and industry debates. However, comments submitted by readers that are defamatory or deemed, by the editors, to be racist or obscene will be deleted from the database. Furthermore, ITInews's editor would like to caution potential posters on its websites that while it welcomes robust debate, it will not hesitate to make the IP addresses of the authors of such defamatory statements available to the authorities, in the event of a court order compelling them to do so.

Get car, home, life and business insurance quotes in 3 easy steps

Join us today

Insurance Quotes

Car Insurance Quotes
Household Insurance Quotes
Business Insurance Quotes
Funeral Insurance Quotes
Life Insurance Quotes

Read the InsuranceQuotes Blog

Healthcare Insurance - Medical Schemes
Medical Schemes
State Healthcare

More in Healthcare Insurance : Medical Schemes
Regulation 8 – Do we really think this is our only problem?
A rights based medical scheme framework with voluntary membership requirements
Discovery Health response to Stan Eiser
It is unclear why Mr. Eiser chooses to persist with these unfounded allegations
Discovery’s probable loss of control over Discovery Health Medical Scheme
By now Gore should have reduced Limited’s cash dependency on DHMS
Medical aids "need to demystify themselves"
Medical aids are offering less value for money
Regulator of medical schemes concerned over false advertising, high administration fees
"The public is being misled"
High Court dismissal of BHF application has profound implications for medical schemes industry
Triumph of a fanciful ideology on healthcare financing that lacks sustainability
I found your article on the court ruling regarding PMBs to be misleading
The uncertainty with regards to pricing of healthcare will be allowed to continue
Victory for regulator, members of medical schemes
The prescribed minimum benefits (PMBs) which protect members of medical schemes remain in place
Regulator deregisters GetMed Medical Scheme
Complaints received from its members
There are 2 realities about private medical cover in SA
Firstly it is expensive and secondly, benefit structures are complex
The latest on Bonitas Medical Fund
Postponement of the special general meeting and elections to 28 May 2011
Regulator wants curator for Sizwe Medical Fund
Investigation points to material irregularities
Bonitas in new hands
Costs awarded on a punitive basis
Regulator wants curator for Bonitas Medical Fund
... the third-largest medical scheme
Resolution no longer an administrator and managed care organisation
Flagrant contravention of the provisions contained in Regulation 23 of the Medical Schemes Act
How to choose your medical aid
I’m often asked by patients to
SAG Response to SAMA
Reduce the power of administrators
Specialist Advocacy Group overview
Particularly concerned for the safety of the patient in the current environment
Nonsense, says Discovery Health, we’ve never been better - response to newsletter
DHMS continues to enjoy the highest rating of any medical scheme in South Africa
Public or private practice?
Healthcare is a monopolistic business

Available Recruitment:
No Vacancies Listed...

ITM Website Design Cape Town
Copyright © 2005 - 2015 ITInews Online Publications (Pty) Ltd. All rights reserved Insurance Times & Investments Online and ITInews. ..::ISSN 1995-1256::.. No part of the materials including graphics or logos, available in this Web site may be copied, photocopied, reproduced, translated or reduced to any electronic medium or machine-readable form, in whole or in part, without specific permission from ITInews Online Publications (Pty) Ltd. Distribution for commercial purposes is prohibited.