Google
RSS Feeds RSS | Views on ITInews | contact | terms of use | privacy 
 


Editorial Categories:

FINANCIAL SERVICES
ADVISERS & BROKERS
BANKING & BONDS
BUSINESS MANAGEMENT
COLUMNISTS
CONSUMER AFFAIRS
CRIME & FRAUD
ECONOMY & GLOBAL
EDUCATION & TRAINING
ESTATES & WILLS
HEALTHCARE INSURANCE
INDUSTRY & LEGISLATION
INSURANCE
INVESTING
LEGAL AFFAIRS
LIABILITY INSURANCE
LIFE INSURANCE
MARKETING
PEOPLE & COMPANIES
POLITICS
PROPERTY
RETIREMENT PROVISION
REVIEWS
ROAD ACCIDENT FUND
SHARES & UNIT TRUSTS
SHORT-TERM INSURANCE
TAXATION
TECHNOLOGY
VIEWS & LETTERS


Forthcoming Events:

No Upcoming Events



Save by getting insurance quotes


Proudly South AfricanInforming Consumers and Financial Advisors since 1988 | Click Here to Advertise
Car, household, life and business insurance quotes

News Article : Regulator of medical schemes concerned over false advertising, high administration fees
Category: Healthcare Insurance : Medical Schemes
Author:Edited by ITInews
Email:[email protected]
Posted:21 Sep 2012

 Email this article Comment on this Article  Print this article

"The public is being misled"

The Council for Medical Schemes is concerned that some entities in the medical schemes industry employ false advertising strategies to deliberately mislead the public.

Council is also concerned over the exceptionally high fees which some medical schemes pay to their administrators.

Council is the regulator of the medical schemes industry, responsible for enforcing compliance with the Medical Schemes Act 131 of 1998 to ensure that the interests of beneficiaries are prioritised at all times.

“The public is being misled, and the monthly contributions which members pay to their respective schemes can be abused to serve commercial interests,” said Dr Monwabisi Gantsho, Registrar of Medical Schemes and Chief Executive of Council. “These practices are extremely worrying and should stop.”

False advertising

Both the Consumer Protection Act 68 of 2008 and the Advertising Standards Authority of South Africa prescribe that information provided to consumers must be truthful – and not false, misleading, or deceptive in any way. This applies to information about the providers themselves as well as the goods and services being offered and marketed.

“In pursuit of this fundamental value, Council continues to strive to be consistent in its regulatory approach and practice,” added Dr Gantsho.

In addition, the Consumer Protection Act clearly states that all information must be provided in plain language that is easily understandable by the audience being targeted.

Consumers at large and beneficiaries of medical schemes in particular should therefore be able to distinguish between a medical scheme and its administrator.

The distinction is important because the two entities are fundamentally different in nature.

A medical scheme is essentially a trust fund, a non-profit organisation which belongs to its members – the people who pay the monthly contributions into the scheme’s risk pool. The trustees responsible for running medical schemes answer to the members; they have the fiduciary responsibility to manage the members’ funds more carefully than they would their own money.

An administrator, on the other hand, is a commercially driven entity interested in maximising its profit margin and value to its shareholders. Administrators are accountable to the medical schemes they administer, not the other way around.

The responsibility to communicate with members – and to communicate in a truthful and clear manner – rests with the medical scheme, not its administrator. Council holds the trustees of medical schemes accountable for ensuring that the respective schemes share accurate information with their members in an open and transparent manner.

High administration fees

The non-health expenditure of medical schemes has been decreasing in real terms in recent years.

However, Council remains concerned that administration expenditure (with specific reference to administration fees), which constitutes the bulk of non-health expenditure, remains unacceptably high in individual cases.

Medical schemes are encouraged to exercise caution when employing the services of third parties. Trustees should ensure that such services add value to the scheme and its members, and the related fees should be reasonable and fair, and aligned to services provided.

Comments:
There are no comments at this stage. Be the first to comment!
Please Login To Comment On an Article - Click here To Login

ITInews invites comments at the foot of each of its articles in which readers can respond freely - anonymously if they wish - to various topical issues and industry debates. However, comments submitted by readers that are defamatory or deemed, by the editors, to be racist or obscene will be deleted from the database. Furthermore, ITInews's editor would like to caution potential posters on its websites that while it welcomes robust debate, it will not hesitate to make the IP addresses of the authors of such defamatory statements available to the authorities, in the event of a court order compelling them to do so.



Get car, home, life and business insurance quotes in 3 easy steps



Join us today

Insurance Quotes


Car Insurance Quotes
Household Insurance Quotes
Business Insurance Quotes
Funeral Insurance Quotes
Life Insurance Quotes

Read the InsuranceQuotes Blog

Healthcare Insurance - Medical Schemes
Aids
Medical Schemes
Medicines
State Healthcare

More in Healthcare Insurance : Medical Schemes
The healthy decline of South African Medical Aid Schemes
Raising contributions while reducing benefits is not sustainable
Regulation 8 – Do we really think this is our only problem?
A rights based medical scheme framework with voluntary membership requirements
Discovery Health response to Stan Eiser
It is unclear why Mr. Eiser chooses to persist with these unfounded allegations
Discovery’s probable loss of control over Discovery Health Medical Scheme
By now Gore should have reduced Limited’s cash dependency on DHMS
Medical aids "need to demystify themselves"
Medical aids are offering less value for money
High Court dismissal of BHF application has profound implications for medical schemes industry
Triumph of a fanciful ideology on healthcare financing that lacks sustainability
I found your article on the court ruling regarding PMBs to be misleading
The uncertainty with regards to pricing of healthcare will be allowed to continue
Victory for regulator, members of medical schemes
The prescribed minimum benefits (PMBs) which protect members of medical schemes remain in place
Regulator deregisters GetMed Medical Scheme
Complaints received from its members
There are 2 realities about private medical cover in SA
Firstly it is expensive and secondly, benefit structures are complex
The latest on Bonitas Medical Fund
Postponement of the special general meeting and elections to 28 May 2011
Regulator wants curator for Sizwe Medical Fund
Investigation points to material irregularities
Bonitas in new hands
Costs awarded on a punitive basis
Regulator wants curator for Bonitas Medical Fund
... the third-largest medical scheme
Resolution no longer an administrator and managed care organisation
Flagrant contravention of the provisions contained in Regulation 23 of the Medical Schemes Act
How to choose your medical aid
I’m often asked by patients to
SAG Response to SAMA
Reduce the power of administrators
Specialist Advocacy Group overview
Particularly concerned for the safety of the patient in the current environment
Nonsense, says Discovery Health, we’ve never been better - response to newsletter
DHMS continues to enjoy the highest rating of any medical scheme in South Africa
Public or private practice?
Healthcare is a monopolistic business


Available Recruitment:
No Vacancies Listed...


ITM Website Design Cape Town
Copyright © 2005 - 2015 ITInews Online Publications (Pty) Ltd. All rights reserved Insurance Times & Investments Online and ITInews. ..::ISSN 1995-1256::.. No part of the materials including graphics or logos, available in this Web site may be copied, photocopied, reproduced, translated or reduced to any electronic medium or machine-readable form, in whole or in part, without specific permission from ITInews Online Publications (Pty) Ltd. Distribution for commercial purposes is prohibited.